So, Iggy's approval rating is now sitting at 14%.
Dion's rating, three days after leading the Liberals to defeat in the 2008 election, was 23%. That was considered bad enough that they gave him the boot.*
So, when's Iggy tendering his resignation?
*Okay, that's not quite true. He was given the boot as much because the "natural governing party of Canada" felt they shouldn't stoop so low as to enter into a coalition with the NDP as any other reason. In other words, they're delusional.
Showing posts with label LPC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LPC. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Monday, December 6, 2010
Tories Boost Liberals in Byelection?
From the Hill Times:
More at the article. This is really getting pathetic. Really, they traded Dion for this guy? And yet, they're still convinced they're the natural party of Canada, that all they have to do to win a majority is wait it out.
I wish it were true, but it isn't. You really do need to give people a reason to vote for you (besides "ooga booga scary tories," I mean.)
A top Tory from Winnipeg told The Hill Times that had the Conservatives mounted the same candidate who ran in Winnipeg North in the 2008 election, Ray Larkin, whose daughter Marni Larkin is a senior director and organizer for the federal Conservatives in Manitoba, NDP candidate Kevin Chief would likely have won.
Instead, late last summer, after Mr. Lamoureux defeated a prominent member of the large Filipino community in the riding for the byelection nomination, the Conservatives dropped Mr. Larkin and selected a little-known member of the Filipino expatriate population, Julie Javier, who barely ran a campaign, avoided candidate debates and media interviews, featured a mobile poster mounted atop an automobile that sporadically appeared in the riding, and drew criticism from even Conservative party members for her lacklustre effort.
The end result gave Ms. Javier a paltry 1,647 votes, which NDP MP Pat Martin (Winnipeg Centre, Man.) says came largely from a diehard knot of Filipino Conservative supporters who supported the tough-on-crime agenda Prime Minister Harper (Calgary Southwest, Alta.) drew attention to on his only low-profile visit to the riding. Had Mr. Larkin been the Conservative candidate, after having won 5,033 votes and 22 per cent of the vote in the 2008 election, Liberal candidate Kevin Lamoureux, who resigned his provincial legislative assembly seat to contest the byelection, would have lost, the senior Conservative said.
It appears that despite allegations the Conservatives put up Ms. Javier to draw votes from the Liberals, the opposite was the case—Prime Minister Harper and the Conservatives wanted Mr. Lamoureux to win.
Party insiders say there is one main reason: They want Mr. Ignatieff to be leading the Liberal Party into the next general election. Mr. Ignatieff has the lowest personal voter support ratings on the federal scene, perhaps since Brian Mulroney, although not for the same reasons, and he has been unable to bring the party's support above the 30-per-cent threshold in public opinion polls.
More at the article. This is really getting pathetic. Really, they traded Dion for this guy? And yet, they're still convinced they're the natural party of Canada, that all they have to do to win a majority is wait it out.
I wish it were true, but it isn't. You really do need to give people a reason to vote for you (besides "ooga booga scary tories," I mean.)
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
And Another Liberal Myth Bites the Dust
Ever since the Ignatief and Rae came out in favour of an extension to the Afghanistan mission, LPC apologists have been claiming that there's tons - tons, I tell you! - of Liberal MPs who are up in arms about the stance the party leaders have taken. These anonymous MPs, so the apologists say, vehemently oppose the measure.
Warren Kinsella, whose web page I've linked to before, would be one such apologist.
This claim may, in fact, be true. Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter because these anonymous Liberal gainsayers never bother to actually speak up. Not even when it comes to the Bloc's largely toothless Afghan motion, which has been defeated 209-81.
Every single Liberal MP present voted against the motion.
Every. Single. One.
The Liberal Party of Canada is a bunch of useless twats, no matter what their apologists might claim. If they can't even manage a largely meaningless moral stance on this issue, then there's really not much point in making any "big tent" claims, because the only opinion that matters is Iggy's.
UPDATE: There were four Liberal MPs absent from the vote: Cuzner, Fry, Volpe, Folco.
Warren Kinsella, whose web page I've linked to before, would be one such apologist.
This claim may, in fact, be true. Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter because these anonymous Liberal gainsayers never bother to actually speak up. Not even when it comes to the Bloc's largely toothless Afghan motion, which has been defeated 209-81.
Every single Liberal MP present voted against the motion.
Every. Single. One.
The Liberal Party of Canada is a bunch of useless twats, no matter what their apologists might claim. If they can't even manage a largely meaningless moral stance on this issue, then there's really not much point in making any "big tent" claims, because the only opinion that matters is Iggy's.
UPDATE: There were four Liberal MPs absent from the vote: Cuzner, Fry, Volpe, Folco.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)